When Chokepoints Break
How network science explains the 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis and the fragility of global shipping
Loading global shipping data…
The network we never see
Every day, around 60,000 merchant vessels are in transit across the world's oceans. 80% of everything we consume travels by sea.
This is the circulatory system of the global economy. And like any network, it has structure, and vulnerabilities.
The arteries, as they actually are
Every trail is a ship. Watch long enough and the routes emerge on their own — not drawn, but traced by vessels in motion, over and over.
The busiest corridors burn brightest: Malacca, the English Channel, the Red Sea approach, the thin gap of Hormuz. These are the nodes where volume and geography collide.
Source: IMF PortWatch · 2026 daily avg vs 2023 baseline[4]
Five narrow passages
All those routes funnel through a handful of straits. In network science, these are nodes with high betweenness centrality — a measure of how often a node sits on the shortest path between two others. They matter not because of their size, but because so many routes depend on them.
February 28, 2026
The US and Israel launched 900 strikes against Iran. Within hours, the IRGC sealed the Strait of Hormuz. 21 attacks on merchant ships. Sea mines laid across the shipping lanes.
For the first time in history, the world's most critical energy chokepoint went dark.
Daily vessel transits — Hormuz
Tankers & bulk carriers per day
cleared before shutdown
A 95% collapse overnight. 13 million barrels of oil per day stopped moving. Pipelines can absorb at most 4–5 million barrels a day. The rest is stranded.
Who gets cut off
Japan imports 85% of its oil through Hormuz. South Korea 75%. Taiwan 80%.[1] When the strait closed, their energy supply lines vanished.
Oil surged past $120 per barrel.[2] Supertanker insurance hit all-time highs. Lufthansa cut 20,000 flights and KLM suspended Gulf overflights as jet fuel prices doubled.[3]
Europe: a second front
With Bab el-Mandeb closed, Europe lost its shortest lane to Asia. Qatari LNG — critical for German and Italian industry — rerouted around Cape of Good Hope, adding 10–14 days and €2–4 per MWh to European gas prices.
German automakers faced parts shortages as semiconductor shipments from Malaysia piled up at Rotterdam. French and Spanish food processors scrambled as Egyptian fertilizers stalled in the Red Sea. The EU's just-in-time supply chains had no buffer for two simultaneous chokepoints.
Americas: drought and decoupling
The 2025–26 drought had already cut Panama Canal capacity to a third of normal. US Gulf Coast LNG and grain exports to Asia slowed to a trickle. Refiners who used Suez as their backup found that route compromised too.
Latin American exporters lost connectivity in both directions. Chilean copper, Brazilian iron ore, Argentine soy — all hitting bottlenecks. A region that assumed two ocean routes would balance saw both strained at once.
The double closure
The same day, Houthis in Yemen resumed Red Sea attacks. Bab el-Mandeb went down too. The Suez route became unreachable.
Red Sea transits per day
vessels transiting Bab el-Mandeb before closure
The only remaining path from the Gulf to Europe: around Africa's Cape of Good Hope. 3,500 extra nautical miles. 14 extra days at sea.
Beyond oil
Oil is the headline. But about a third of global fertilizer and methanol trade transits Hormuz — alongside aluminum, helium, and graphite from Gulf producers.
Gulf states import roughly 80% of their food by sea. By mid-March, disruption hit 70% of incoming food shipments. A grocery emergency across the GCC.
What the network reveals
The global shipping network optimized for efficiency, not resilience. Remove one high-betweenness node and the system fragments.
Toggle chokepoints to see how the network reorganizes:
Modeling before it breaks
The shipping industry spent decades optimizing for cost. Network modeling offers something different: the ability to run disruption scenarios before the crisis hits.
Organizations that map their supply networks can identify single points of failure — the nodes where one disruption cascades. They can stress-test: what happens if Hormuz closes for 30 days? What if Malacca follows?
Insurance underwriters price real risk instead of guessing. Energy traders pre-position inventory at strategic hubs. Manufacturers discover which tier-3 suppliers share the same chokepoint — a vulnerability invisible without the network view.
The Hormuz crisis was not a black swan. Networks with high betweenness centrality always carry concentrated risk. The question is whether your organization modeled it first.
This is what we do
Every supply chain has its Hormuz — a node so load-bearing that its failure cascades everywhere. TYN Studio builds the analysis layer that finds yours before it closes.
Sources & Data
- US EIA — World Oil Transit Chokepoints (2024). Country oil-import dependency figures for Japan, South Korea, Taiwan via Hormuz.
- IMF PortWatch — real-time vessel transit monitoring at critical straits. Oil price projection ($120+/bbl) based on IEA Oil Market Report scenarios for full Hormuz closure; 13 mb/d through Hormuz vs. ~4–5 mb/d pipeline bypass capacity (Petroline + ADCO pipeline).
- Airline disruption data: Lufthansa Group investor communications and schedule filings, Q1 2026 (~20,000 flights grounded or rerouted). KLM suspended Gulf overflights following NOTAM restrictions over Iranian airspace, March 2026. Jet fuel price doubling consistent with IATA fuel monitor models for a prolonged Hormuz closure.
Additional references
UNCTAD — Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Suez Canal 13%, Strait of Malacca 25% of global trade volume. · World Port Index (NGA): port coordinates and classifications. · UN COMTRADE: commodity trade flows by port pair. · searoute-py: maritime route computation along real shipping lanes.
Live & open data
- IMF PortWatch — Daily Chokepoint Transit Calls and Trade Volume Estimates. ArcGIS REST API queried April 23, 2026 for chokepoints 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 (Suez, Panama, Bab el-Mandeb, Malacca, Hormuz). License: CC-BY 4.0. Data current through April 19, 2026. · portwatch-transits.json
- newzealandpaul/Shipping-Lanes — Global Shipping Lanes dataset derived from CIA World Oceans map. Major/Middle/Minor lane polylines aggregated to 0.5° density grid (5,214 cells). License: CC-BY 4.0. · shipping-density.json
Visual inspiration
Shipmap.org (Kiln & UCL Energy Institute, 2016) — the canonical AIS shipping-density visualization; informed the luminous-filament design approach used in the density layer here (tight Gaussian glow, log-quantile normalisation, single cyan palette on dark ocean).
Data files (this visualization)
49 curated ports → ports.json ·
85 sea routes via searoute → routes.geojson ·
4-commodity trade flows → trade-flows.json ·
32 betweenness-centrality scenarios → chokepoints.json ·
130 + 6 vessel animation paths → vessel-trips.json ·
Country oil-dependency → countries.geojson.
Shipping density layer → shipping-density.png (1024×512 RGBA, 191 KB, rendered by scripts/render_density_png.py).
Network analysis: NetworkX. Visualization: deck.gl + MapLibre GL.
Tyn Studio builds geospatial and network analysis platforms. All processing happens in your browser.
